Party wall disputes are surprisingly common, but they don't have to escalate into neighbor wars or expensive court battles. The Party Wall Act 1996 provides effective mechanisms for resolving disagreements without litigation. This comprehensive guide covers the most common disputes, how to resolve them, and practical tips for maintaining good relations throughout building projects.
The Top 10 Most Common Party Wall Disputes
Dispute #1: "My Neighbour Started Work Without Notice"
Situation: Building owner commences party wall works without serving proper notice (or any notice at all).
Why It Happens: Ignorance of the law, bad advice from builders, attempt to save time/money.
Solution:
- Immediate action: Write to neighbour requesting works cease immediately
- Demand retrospective notice: They must serve notice now (process continues from there)
- Appoint surveyor: Protect your rights with professional representation
- Injunction option: County Court can stop works if serious risk of damage
- Claim costs: Neighbour pays for emergency surveyor fees and any damage
Dispute #2: "The Notice is Inadequate or Unclear"
Situation: Notice served but lacks essential information (proper drawings, work description, dates).
Why It Happens: DIY notices, inexperienced surveyors, incomplete architectural plans.
Solution:
- Request clarification: Ask for detailed drawings and specifications in writing
- Formal rejection: Invalid notices can be rejected; proper notice must be re-served
- Surveyor review: Appoint surveyor to assess notice validity
- Reset clock: Valid notice restarts the 14-day response period
Dispute #3: "Works Go Beyond What the Notice Specified"
Situation: Building owner carries out additional works not mentioned in original notice.
Why It Happens: Project scope expands, structural issues discovered mid-project, "while we're at it" additions.
Solution:
- Stop unauthorized works: Anything beyond the notice is not permitted
- Require new notice: Additional works need separate party wall notice
- Award breach: If award exists and work exceeds it, this is a breach
- Injunction possible: Court can stop non-compliant works
- Damages claimable: For any damage from unauthorized works
Dispute #4: "Excessive Noise and Disruption"
Situation: Works carried out at unreasonable hours, excessive noise, or prolonged disruption.
Why It Happens: Builder schedule pressures, disregard for award terms, lack of consideration.
Solution:
- Check award terms: Working hours should be specified (typically 8am-6pm weekdays, 8am-1pm Saturday)
- Formal complaint: Write to building owner and surveyor documenting breaches
- Surveyor enforcement: Surveyor can require compliance with award
- Noise nuisance: If outside award, contact local council Environmental Health
- Compensation: Claim for excessive disruption beyond award terms
Dispute #5: "Property Damage During Works"
Situation: Adjoining property damaged by building works (cracks, subsidence, water ingress).
Why It Happens: Inadequate temporary support, vibration, settlement, poor workmanship.
Solution:
- Document immediately: Photographs, dates, detailed descriptions
- Notify all parties: Building owner, surveyor, in writing (email + recorded delivery)
- Compare to schedule: Schedule of condition proves damage is new
- Request works stoppage: If damage is worsening or serious
- Expert assessment: Structural engineer report if needed
- Enforce repair rights: Building owner MUST make good all damage (strict liability under Section 7(2))
Dispute #6: "Refusal to Pay Surveyor Fees"
Situation: Building owner disputes or refuses to pay adjoining owner's surveyor fees.
Why It Happens: Sticker shock at costs, belief fees are excessive, cash flow problems.
Solution:
- Legal obligation: Section 10 requires building owner pay all reasonable fees
- Fee reasonableness: Must be proportionate and justified
- Third surveyor determination: If fees genuinely disputed, third surveyor decides
- Award includes fees: Surveyor costs should be detailed in award
- County Court action: Last resort to enforce payment
Dispute #7: "No Schedule of Condition Prepared"
Situation: Works proceed without a proper pre-work schedule of condition.
Why It Happens: Building owner consent given, surveyor skips this step, cost-cutting.
Solution:
- Insist on schedule: Even if you consent, request schedule before works start
- DIY photography: If professional schedule refused, take your own extensive photos
- Date-stamped evidence: Use camera EXIF data, email photos to yourself
- Third-party witness: Friend/family member to witness condition
- Professional assessment: Hire own surveyor for schedule (building owner should pay)
Dispute #8: "Access Refusal or Obstruction"
Situation: Adjoining owner refuses reasonable access for works or inspections.
Why It Happens: Relationship breakdown, fear of damage, distrust, inconvenience.
Solution:
- Section 8 rights: Building owner has legal right of access with proper notice
- Notice requirement: Must give 14 days' written notice (except emergencies)
- Reasonable times: Access during working hours, minimize disruption
- Accompany access: Adjoining owner can be present during access
- Criminal offence: Refusing reasonable access can result in £200 fine
- Court order: Building owner can obtain court order compelling access
Dispute #9: "Surveyors Cannot Agree"
Situation: Building owner's surveyor and adjoining owner's surveyor reach deadlock on award terms.
Why It Happens: Genuinely difficult technical issues, unreasonable positions, poor surveyor skills.
Solution:
- Third surveyor appointment: Either surveyor can trigger this (or both jointly)
- Third surveyor selection: Agreed by both surveyors; if can't agree, selected by RICS President
- Determination: Third surveyor makes binding decision on disputed matters
- Costs: Usually split 50/50 or determined by third surveyor
- Final decision: Third surveyor's determination is final (no appeal to fourth surveyor!)
Dispute #10: "Award Terms Breached During Works"
Situation: Building owner ignores award conditions (wrong methods, wrong hours, unauthorized access).
Why It Happens: Builder ignorance, schedule pressure, disregard for agreement, cost-cutting.
Solution:
- Document breach: Photos, dates, witness statements
- Formal notice: Write to building owner citing specific award breaches
- Surveyor intervention: Surveyor can require compliance
- Works stoppage: Request works cease until compliance achieved
- Injunction: County Court can enforce award terms
- Damages: Compensation for losses caused by breach
The Third Surveyor Process
When to Appoint a Third Surveyor:
- Two surveyors cannot agree on award terms
- Dispute about whether work is permitted
- Disagreement on surveyor fees (reasonableness)
- Technical dispute beyond surveyors' agreement
How Third Surveyor Selection Works:
- Joint Selection: Both surveyors try to agree on a third surveyor
- If No Agreement: Either surveyor requests RICS appoint third surveyor
- RICS Selection: President of RICS (or designate) selects third surveyor
- Typically Senior: Third surveyors are usually very experienced specialists
Third Surveyor Determination Process:
- Submissions: Both surveyors submit written cases
- Site Visit: Third surveyor inspects properties
- Review: Considers all evidence, plans, and arguments
- Decision: Makes binding determination on disputed matters
- Award Completion: Original surveyors complete award incorporating determination
Costs:
- Third surveyor fees: £500-£2,000 (depending on complexity)
- Usually split 50/50 between parties
- Third surveyor can determine who pays what
- Unsuccessful party may pay more if unreasonable
Preventing Disputes: Best Practices
For Building Owners:
- ✅ Talk to neighbours BEFORE serving notice
- ✅ Explain your plans clearly and honestly
- ✅ Serve proper, detailed notices with good plans
- ✅ Use qualified, experienced surveyors
- ✅ Offer schedule of condition even if neighbour consents
- ✅ Keep neighbours informed during works
- ✅ Respect working hours and access limits
- ✅ Address concerns promptly
- ✅ Make good any damage immediately
For Adjoining Owners:
- ✅ Respond to notices within 14 days
- ✅ Consider dissenting for protection (not confrontational)
- ✅ Appoint qualified surveyor (costs you nothing)
- ✅ Don't refuse reasonable access
- ✅ Communicate concerns through proper channels
- ✅ Keep emotions out of technical process
- ✅ Document everything in writing
- ✅ Be reasonable – don't block legitimate works
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, but it's usually unnecessary and expensive. The Act's surveyor and third surveyor mechanisms resolve 95%+ of disputes. County Court is typically only needed for: injunctions to stop unauthorized works, enforcing awards if breached, or appeals on points of law. Always exhaust the Act's procedures first.
This is exactly why the surveyor system exists. Let professionals handle the process. Appoint your own surveyor, communicate only through surveyors, and focus on technical/legal issues rather than personal grievances. Many successful party wall outcomes happen despite poor neighbour relations.
Simple surveyor disagreements: 2-4 weeks negotiation. Third surveyor determination: Additional 4-8 weeks. County Court proceedings: 6-12 months. The surveyor route is vastly faster and cheaper than court.
Informal negotiation is fine for very minor issues. However, once a party wall notice is served, the Act's procedures apply. Professional mediation can supplement the surveyor process but doesn't replace it. The surveyor route is specifically designed for party wall matters.
You can replace your surveyor at any time. However, get a second opinion first – what seems unreasonable may be proper protection of your interests. If genuinely problematic, appoint a new surveyor by giving formal notice to all parties.
Facing a Party Wall Dispute?
Our experienced surveyors specialize in dispute resolution and finding practical solutions that protect your interests while maintaining progress on building projects.
Get Expert Help NowConclusion: Disputes Are Solvable
Party wall disputes can feel overwhelming, but the Act provides robust mechanisms for resolution. With professional surveyor support, clear communication, and use of the third surveyor process when needed, almost all disagreements can be resolved without court proceedings.
Remember:
- 95%+ of disputes resolve through surveyors (not courts)
- Third surveyor determination is final and binding
- Prevention is better than cure – communicate early
- Dissent is procedural, not confrontational
- Professional surveyors navigate emotional situations objectively
- Document everything in writing
- Act promptly when issues arise
- County Court is last resort (and rarely needed)